As another week comes to a close, the main players in one the biggest media storm trials in the United States are toiling away the weekend in divergent manners. One is taking that long ride back to the prison. The jurors are sequestered from family and friends. The attorneys are hard at work. You can get the best workers compensation lawyers information by visiting this website.
The United States district judge made a hurried rush out of the courtroom to avoid further probing by the attorneys. He spent several days in testimony being grilled again and again and cross-examined by the opposing counsel. It was a most unpleasant day for the man. Finally, the accused has something to smile about. He appeared drained from replying to seemingly endless queries without expressing much feeling. Marshals were standing by to return him to prison, where he is already serving a 1-4 year sentence for obstruction of justice.
The judge tells the jury to have a good weekend and to relax. He also tells them to enjoy their bus ride. The sequestered jury has been living in a motel. They will probably be taken out this weekend for a picnic and some time spent away from the hotel. Then the judge lays into the lawyers, who have been arguing like siblings, even after being told to stop by the judge.
He has confessed his wrongdoing in covering up the case. In my opinion, this means all of you have done a great job. His testimony has been delivered, and the jury must now determine if he can be believed. Following a break, he stated that it is not his wish for the jurors to be swayed by the court. You will find that further information on workcover melbourne is on that site.
The affect the accused had on the jury will be seen later, but his testimony was very similar and just as strong as the one he’d given during televised committee hearings previously. The prosecutor caught him in some discrepancies on certain dates and times. Some spectators, who had waited in long lines to get into the courtroom, found the arguments between the lawyers and the judge to be much more fun to watch than the actual testimony.
The lawyers were incensed that the government refused to provide the name of the witness scheduled to testify the following Monday and made their feelings known in no uncertain terms. The chief prosecutor points out that the government never agreed to provide the name with more than a single day’s notice, and maintains his claim that he does not yet have the name. It was his opinion that there should be no problem providing the identity of the witness, especially if it would prevent another unpleasant battle.
The prosecutor tried for a compromise. He wanted a written record of his protest of the manner in which the case was prosecuted. “Many months have passed while I have had to wait to receive this information.” They don’t give us the witness names so that we are less effective during cross examination. Thousands of pages of printed testimony have been provided them. Yet, they say their testimony could be found on the back of a matchbook. When the district attorney sighed and said they’d been getting along so well previously, the courtroom filled with laughter. The judge, who had by this point signaled he was ready to leave by standing, said he had enough trouble just trying to control the lawyers.
Tags: claim, law, legal, personal injury
